Emilija Pantic July 18, 2016
JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

NAT school evaluation form 2016
We hope you are enjoying the school. Help us improve it. Also send a picture/selfie  to be posted at the website to Emilija.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
The lectures were at a level where I followed X% of the material
Clear selection
The mix of topics, including basic nuclear physics, nuclear science applications, and nuclear physics experiments was optimal.
Clear selection
The format of the school with about two lectures per day and labs in between worked well.
Clear selection
The labs were interesting and I learned new techniques.
Clear selection
The living arrangements in the residence halls were good, except for internet.  
Clear selection
I would have liked to have an opportunity to present my own research.
Clear selection
Rate PMT 1/2 activities on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate Gamma 1/2/3 activities on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate NAA 2/3/4 activities on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate ELEC 2/3/4 activities on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate SiPM activity on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate MCP activity on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate CRAYFIS activity on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
Rate Proton 2/3 activity on a scale of 0-10.
Low
High
Clear selection
For low ratings (<5) in the previuous questions, please comment on what you disliked
Your answer
Give us your feedback on how to improve the school? More time for some activities? Add lectures on some specific topics? Explain better  X ....
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Google Forms